Skip to main content
Version: 1.31.0

Verifying a release

A GitHub release page is not a chain of custody. Anyone with write access — or anyone who takes it — can replace an asset with a binary that runs just as happily as the real one. Nucleus releases cut from the first signed tag onward therefore publish two independent proofs of where their archives came from, and this page is how you consume them.

Signing cannot be applied retroactively — a release is signed by the run that builds it, with a certificate minted for that run — so releases cut before signing was added publish at most their archives and a checksums.txt, and many of them publish no assets at all (every release from v1.0.0 to v1.15.1, and several as late as v1.22.0). Look at the release page before you start: a signed release lists checksums.txt.sig; one that lists archives and a checksum file can be checked for integrity with sha256sum -c but has no origin to verify; one with an empty asset list gives you neither.

A signed release carries:

AssetWhat it is
nucleus_<version>_<os>_<arch>.tar.gz (.zip on Windows)The CLI archive, six in total.
<archive>.spdx.jsonAn SPDX SBOM, one per archive, listing what went into it.
checksums.txtSHA-256 of every archive and every SBOM.
checksums.txt.sig / checksums.txt.pemA keyless signature over checksums.txt, and the short-lived certificate that made it.

Releases that publish a container image sign and attest it in the same run and against the same identity; the image lives at ghcr.io/jcsvwinston/nucleus rather than on the release page, and section 4 covers it.

There is no long-lived signing key to trust, and none is published. The signature is made by the release workflow itself with a certificate minted for that single run, and what you check is not "who holds the key" but which workflow, in which repository, at which tag produced the release. A build provenance attestation, stored by GitHub rather than on the release page, records the same thing a second way.

Before you start​

Install cosign and the GitHub CLI. Then set the release you are verifying:

export TAG=vX.Y.Z # the signed release you downloaded
export VERSION=${TAG#v}
export PKG=nucleus_${VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz

1. Verify the signature over the checksum file​

Download the checksum file, its signature and its certificate, then check them:

gh release download "$TAG" --repo jcsvwinston/nucleus \
--pattern checksums.txt \
--pattern checksums.txt.sig \
--pattern checksums.txt.pem

cosign verify-blob checksums.txt \
--signature checksums.txt.sig \
--certificate checksums.txt.pem \
--certificate-oidc-issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com \
--certificate-identity "https://github.com/jcsvwinston/nucleus/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/${TAG}"

Verified OK means the checksum file was produced by .github/workflows/release.yml in jcsvwinston/nucleus, running at the tag you named, and has not been altered since.

The identity ends at the tag, not at main

Nearly every cosign example on the internet ends the identity in @refs/heads/main. That string verifies nothing here. The release workflow is dispatched at the tag ref, so the certificate it signs with names @refs/tags/<tag> — substitute the tag you are verifying, exactly as the command above does. An identity ending in refs/heads/main will fail with none of the expected identities matched, and that failure is correct.

If you verify releases from a script and would rather not rewrite the identity for each tag, match the shape instead of the value:

cosign verify-blob checksums.txt \
--signature checksums.txt.sig \
--certificate checksums.txt.pem \
--certificate-oidc-issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com \
--certificate-identity-regexp '^https://github\.com/jcsvwinston/nucleus/\.github/workflows/release\.yml@refs/tags/v[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$'

Keep the anchors and keep refs/tags/ in the pattern. A regexp loose enough to match any ref accepts a signature made from any branch of the repository, which is most of the guarantee gone.

2. Carry the proof across to your archive​

The signature covers checksums.txt. The checksum file covers the archive, so one more step moves the trust onto the file you are about to run:

gh release download "$TAG" --repo jcsvwinston/nucleus --pattern "$PKG"
awk -v f="$PKG" '$2 == f' checksums.txt | sha256sum -c -

On macOS, where there is no sha256sum, the last command is awk -v f="$PKG" '$2 == f' checksums.txt | shasum -a 256 -c -.

The SBOM beside each archive is listed in the same signed checksum file, so the same two commands verify it: append .spdx.json to PKG and run them again.

3. Verify the build provenance​

The second, independent proof does not use the release assets at all: it asks GitHub which workflow run built the file in front of you.

gh attestation verify "$PKG" \
--repo jcsvwinston/nucleus \
--signer-workflow jcsvwinston/nucleus/.github/workflows/release.yml

This matches the archive by digest against the attestation the release job wrote, and --signer-workflow is the part that matters: it refuses an attestation signed by any other workflow, in any other repository. The command reads public data and needs no credentials beyond a logged-in gh.

4. Verify the container image​

The image at ghcr.io/jcsvwinston/nucleus is pushed, signed and attested by the same job, in the same run, as the archives — so the identity to check is the one you already used. Both commands take a tag and resolve it themselves to the digest of the multi-architecture index, which is what was signed:

export IMAGE=ghcr.io/jcsvwinston/nucleus:${VERSION}

cosign verify "$IMAGE" \
--certificate-oidc-issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com \
--certificate-identity "https://github.com/jcsvwinston/nucleus/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/${TAG}"

The tag-not-main caution above applies here unchanged, and so does the regexp form if you verify from a script — only the subject changes, from checksums.txt to the image reference.

The provenance attestation is checked the same way as the archive's, with an oci:// subject:

gh attestation verify "oci://$IMAGE" \
--repo jcsvwinston/nucleus \
--signer-workflow jcsvwinston/nucleus/.github/workflows/release.yml

Both commands read the registry, so an image that is not public needs a docker login ghcr.io first. Resolve the tag to a digest once (docker buildx imagetools inspect "$IMAGE") and verify ghcr.io/jcsvwinston/nucleus@sha256:… instead if you want the check pinned to exactly the image you are about to run — a tag can be moved, a digest cannot.

When verification fails​

  • no matching signatures or none of the expected identities matched — the identity string is the first thing to check, and the tag inside it the first part of that. See the note above.
  • The release publishes no checksums.txt.sig — releases cut before signing was introduced carry at most archives and a checksum file, and many carry no assets at all. Where a checksums.txt is published the archives can still be checked for integrity with sha256sum -c, but there is nothing to verify their origin against; upgrade to a release that publishes a signature.
  • gh attestation verify reports no attestation — same reason, same answer.
  • The image tag does not exist — releases cut before the image pipeline was added publish archives only, and a prerelease publishes its version tag without moving latest. The repository's Packages page lists what is there.

Report anything that verifies against an identity other than the one above, or an archive whose digest is absent from a validly signed checksum file, through the repository's security policy rather than a public issue.